Trusted By
Digital therapeutics have shifted from concept to clinical practice. FDA-cleared DTx now treats insomnia, ADHD, substance use disorder, chronic pain, and multiple mental health conditions. CMS reimbursement pathways under digital mental health treatment codes are opening in 2025-2026. DTx companies, pharmaceutical companies with DTx programs, and health tech startups need development partners with FDA SaMD experience, ISO 13485 quality management, and the clinical software depth to ship regulatory-approvable products.
| Statstics | What it means |
|---|---|
| $32.5B | Global digital therapeutics market by 2030, growing at 26.1% CAGR per Grand View Research. FDA-cleared DTx are moving from novelty to standard of care. |
| 20+ | FDA-cleared DTx products as of 2025, covering conditions from insomnia to substance use disorder to ADHD. The regulatory pathway is clear. |
| 510(k) or De Novo | Primary FDA clearance pathways for most DTx products. Both require ISO 13485 quality management system and rigorous clinical validation. |
| DMHT codes | CMS Digital Mental Health Treatment codes proposed for 2025 reimbursement. Insurance coverage removes the biggest DTx commercial barrier. |
DTx development lives or dies on two things clinical software rarely combines: FDA regulatory rigor under design controls and the software engineering depth to ship a product patients actually complete a therapeutic course on. Eight service pillars covering the full lifecycle of an FDA-regulated DTx build, from concept through 510(k) submission and post-market surveillance.
Ground-up DTx platform development covering a patient-facing therapeutic app, clinician dashboard, biometric and behavioral data ingestion, adaptive intervention engine, and regulatory documentation package. Built under ISO 13485 quality management.
Software as a Medical Device development is aligned with FDA guidance for SaMD. Includes design controls, risk management (ISO 14971), verification and validation, and 510(k) or De Novo submission technical documentation.
Development support for clinical validation studies including protocol design consultation, IRB documentation, study data collection infrastructure, and clinical outcome measurement instrumentation.
AI-adaptive therapeutic engines that personalize interventions based on patient response, biometric data, and behavioral patterns. Includes reinforcement learning, digital biomarker analysis, and adherence prediction models. See our healthcare AI solutions.
Prescription digital therapeutics platforms integrated with e-prescribing systems, pharmacy networks, and payer prior authorization workflows. Reimbursement-ready architecture for DMHT codes and other emerging CMS pathways.
Digital biomarker measurement and companion diagnostic software supporting pharmaceutical drug programs. Passive sensing, active assessment, and clinical outcome measurement infrastructure.
DTx integration with major EHR platforms for prescription workflow, adherence reporting, and clinical outcome data exchange. Ties into our EHR integration services.
Post-market surveillance software for FDA-cleared DTx includes adverse event reporting, real-world outcome tracking, medical device reporting (MDR), and regulatory reporting infrastructure.
DTx development engagements run longer and carry heavier regulatory weight than typical software builds, with delivery timelines of 12 to 24 months and design control obligations from Sprint 0 through post-market. Four engagement structures matched to your regulatory pathway, clinical validation stage, and internal team capacity.
A dedicated cross-functional team (product manager, tech lead, developers, ML engineers, QA, regulatory affairs consultant) working exclusively on your DTx build for a fixed monthly rate. Best for Series A DTx startups and pharma companies with active clinical validation running parallel to development. Fits 12 to 24-month builds where scope evolves with FDA pre-submission feedback.
Fixed price, fixed scope, fixed timeline covering DTx build plus 510(k) or De Novo technical documentation package. Best for organizations with an existing predicate device path, finalized indication and intended use statement, and completed clinical validation. Typical delivery runs 10 to 14 months against a defined change-order process.
Hourly billing against agreed rate cards, best for research-stage DTx exploring product-market fit or iterative clinical validation cycles requiring adaptive software changes. Best for pre-seed and seed-stage DTx startups, pharma R&D groups, and academic medical center innovation teams. Rolling monthly commitment with flexible ramp-up and ramp-down.
End-to-end ownership of design, build, launch, regulatory support, and post-market surveillance software including MDR reporting infrastructure and real-world evidence tracking. Best for pharma companies without internal digital health engineering or health systems spinning out DTx products. Multi-year engagement with fixed monthly rate and quarterly evolution roadmap.
We ensure you’re matched with the right talent resource based on your requirement.
DTx buyers share one thing: FDA clearance obligations that shape every product decision from Sprint 0 forward. Beyond that, they diverge sharply on funding stage, clinical validation strategy, reimbursement pathway, and whether DTx is the core product or a companion to drugs and devices. Six buyer segments where our team has shipped FDA-regulated DTx software under ISO 13485 design controls.
Digital therapeutics companies at seed to Series C stages are building their first FDA-cleared product or expanding a product portfolio. Common builds: standalone DTx apps, PDT platforms, and reimbursement-ready architecture.
Pharma organizations are building DTx as combination products with drugs (SE drugs), as companion apps, or as standalone therapeutic offerings. Common builds: adherence support DTx, patient support programs with therapeutic components, and clinical trial companion apps.
Digital health startups pivoting from wellness apps to FDA-regulated DTx. Common builds: 510(k)-ready platform modernization, regulatory documentation catch-up, and clinical validation infrastructure.
Academic medical centers and health system innovation teams are building DTx for internal deployment or a spin-off. Common builds: institution-specific therapeutic protocols, IRB-approved clinical validation platforms, and provider-facing DTx.
Health plans are building or piloting DTx as covered benefits. Common builds: member-facing DTx platforms tied to specific conditions, prior authorization workflow integration, and outcomes measurement infrastructure.
Traditional medical device manufacturers are extending into software as therapy. Common builds: connected device DTx combinations, remote monitoring plus intervention platforms, and post-market surveillance software.
Every DTx build we ship carries a paper trail: design history file, risk management file, verification and validation records, usability engineering documentation, and traceability matrix. That paper trail is what makes the difference between a submission that clears FDA review and one that gets a deficiency letter. Six-phase model built to generate that documentation as a byproduct of daily engineering, not as a scramble before submission.
Sprint 0 Discovery and Regulatory Strategy
Three to five weeks. Therapeutic scope, target patient population, indication, FDA classification (Class I, II, III), regulatory pathway (510(k) vs De Novo vs PMA), and clinical validation strategy.
SAMD Architecture and Design Controls
Three to five weeks. Software architecture aligned with FDA guidance, ISO 14971 risk management framework, design controls setup under ISO 13485, and traceability matrix foundation.
DTX Platform Development
Twelve to twenty weeks. Patient app, clinician dashboard, adaptive intervention engine, data ingestion, and analytics built in two-week sprints under design controls.
Verification, Validation, and Clinical Study Support
Six to ten weeks. Software verification testing, usability engineering (ISO 62366), cybersecurity validation, and clinical study data infrastructure.
Regulatory Submission and QA
Four to six weeks. 510(k) or De Novo submission technical documentation, quality management system evidence package, and pre-submission Q&A support.
Launch, Post-Market Surveillance, and Iteration
Two to three weeks for launch, then ongoing. Production monitoring, adverse event reporting, real-world outcome tracking, and continuous evolution under design controls.
Three recent engagements where our team shipped FDA-regulated DTx software that survived pre-submission review, IND documentation scrutiny, and 510(k) readiness audit.
A Series A mental health DTx startup needed a 510(k)-ready platform for its cognitive behavioral therapy product targeting anxiety and depression. We built the patient app on React Native, the clinician dashboard on React, and the adaptive intervention engine using reinforcement learning. Delivered under ISO 13485 in 12 months. FDA pre-submission review completed successfully.
Discover
A pharmaceutical company launching a chronic cardiovascular therapy needed a DTx-classified companion app for medication adherence and behavior change. We built the platform on a HIPAA-compliant AWS stack with connected device integration and clinical outcome tracking. Delivered in 10 months with FDA IND-supporting documentation.
Discover
A Series B health tech company needed to modernize its insomnia DTx platform from a legacy stack to a modern 510(k)-ready architecture. We migrated the platform, added AI-adaptive intervention logic, and rebuilt the clinical validation data infrastructure. Delivered in 9 months.
Discover| Mobile Development |
React Native | Flutter | Swift (iOS) | Kotlin (Android) | Apple ResearchKit | Apple CareKit |
| Frontend Frameworks |
React | Angular | Vue.js | Next.js | TypeScript |
| Backend Frameworks |
Node.js | .NET Core | Java Spring Boot | Python Django | FastAPI |
| AI and ML |
TensorFlow | PyTorch | scikit-learn | Reinforcement learning libraries | Custom digital biomarker models |
| LLM and NLP |
GPT-4 | Claude 4 | Anthropic API | OpenAI API | Med-PaLM | Custom fine-tuning |
| Databases |
PostgreSQL | MongoDB | Redis | Amazon Aurora | TimescaleDB (time-series biometric data) |
| Cloud Platforms |
AWS (HIPAA-eligible) | Microsoft Azure | Google Cloud Platform |
| Wearable and Biometric SDKs |
Apple HealthKit | Google Health Connect | Fitbit | Withings | Empatica | Custom device SDKs |
| Analytics and Clinical Data |
Snowflake | Databricks | Power BI | Tableau | REDCap (research data) | custom analytics |
| Regulatory Documentation Tools |
Greenlight Guru | MasterControl | Custom document management | Traceability matrix tools |
DTx builds fail when the development partner lacks either FDA SaMD experience or the clinical software depth to ship a regulatory-approvable product. At Bacancy, our 14 years of healthcare engineering plus ISO 13485 quality management certification plus AI solutions practice give us the rare combination required for FDA-classified DTx development.
Digital therapeutics are FDA-regulated software products that treat, manage, or prevent medical conditions through clinically validated interventions delivered via software. Unlike wellness apps, DTx require FDA clearance (typically 510(k) or De Novo), rigorous clinical validation, and ongoing post-market surveillance. Examples include FDA-cleared products for insomnia, ADHD, substance use disorder, and chronic pain.
If your product is intended to treat, manage, or prevent a medical condition and makes therapeutic claims, yes. FDA clearance (510(k) for products with a predicate, De Novo for first-in-class) is required before US commercialization. Wellness products that avoid therapeutic claims can operate outside FDA jurisdiction but cannot claim therapeutic benefit.
ISO 13485 is the international quality management standard for medical device manufacturers, including software. FDA-cleared DTx must be developed under a quality management system that meets FDA 21 CFR Part 820 requirements, which aligns closely with ISO 13485. Bacancy holds ISO 13485 certification, which is rare among healthcare software development partners.
A focused DTx product from concept to 510(k)-ready platform ships in 12 to 18 months. Complex adaptive DTx with AI intervention engines ship in 15 to 24 months. Post-clearance market launch and evolution runs continuously under design controls.
DTx development cost depends on project scope, therapeutic complexity, regulatory pathway, and clinical validation depth. FDA regulatory submission (external regulatory consultants and FDA fees) and clinical validation studies are separate from engineering costs and add significantly to total program cost. Our team provides a Sprint 0 estimate based on your specific indication, patient population, and regulatory strategy before commitment.
Yes. Our team supports the technical documentation package required for 510(k) and De Novo submissions, including software architecture documentation, verification and validation testing, cybersecurity validation, usability engineering (ISO 62366), and traceability matrix. We work alongside your regulatory affairs team or external regulatory consultants.
Yes. Our AI solutions practice builds adaptive intervention engines using reinforcement learning, digital biomarker analysis, and adherence prediction models. AI in FDA-classified DTx requires additional documentation (predetermined change control plans, model bias testing, real-world performance monitoring), which our team handles under design controls.
Every DTx we build includes post-market surveillance software for adverse event reporting, medical device reporting (MDR), real-world outcome tracking, and cybersecurity vulnerability monitoring. Support contracts include ongoing regulatory reporting infrastructure and design change management.
Yes. Our team supports clinical validation studies including protocol design consultation, IRB documentation infrastructure, REDCap or custom study data collection, and clinical outcome measurement software. Study execution runs through your clinical research team or CRO partners.